Comments for Street Photography https://streetphotography.com/ Street photography is a place for street photographers Wed, 30 Jul 2025 20:42:55 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 Comment on Gökhan Arer On The Pursuit Of Illusions Through Clever Street Photography Compositions by Gökhan Arer – Bilgi Çorbası https://streetphotography.com/gokhan-arer-on-the-pursuit-of-illusions-through-clever-street-photography-compositions/#comment-226 Wed, 30 Jul 2025 20:42:55 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=18054#comment-226 […] İstenen anı yakalamak değil: O, İstanbul’un kaotik akışında gözden kaçan iyileşmemiş anları, şaşırtıcı biçimlerle birleştirmeye çalışıyor. Hem eğlendiriyor, hem düşündürüyor Street Photography121clicks.com. […]

]]>
Comment on The Ethics of Street Photography – Part 3 by mesweet https://streetphotography.com/the-ethics-of-street-photography-part-3/#comment-225 Sun, 27 Jul 2025 19:36:34 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=19511#comment-225 In reply to Quetenaapeter.

Ah, the classic “so what?”—a bold rhetorical shrug masquerading as deep insight. Look, the purpose of these articles isn’t to hand down ethical edicts from Mount Olympus; it’s to spark exactly this kind of friction-filled reflection. You’re absolutely right that ethics vary—but acknowledging that doesn’t make the conversation pointless. It makes it necessary. If everyone simply threw up their hands at subjectivity, we’d never have art, law, or, dare I say, street photography.

You mention “the Law” as the ultimate arbiter, but laws are reactive, not prescriptive—they follow societal debate, they don’t lead it. And while subjectivity is inevitable, pretending it’s tyranny to discuss the ethics of photographing strangers in public is a curious hill to die on. Reflection isn’t censorship, and accountability isn’t artistic oppression.

So yes, everyone has their own lens (pun intended), but if we stop examining what we do through those lenses, we risk turning art into solipsism. And let’s be real—if you’re offended by discussions of ethics in photography, maybe you’re not just “practicing a little” street photography. Maybe the camera isn’t the only thing you should be pointing outward.

]]>
Comment on The ‘Good’ Photographs of American Photography by Quetenaapeter https://streetphotography.com/the-good-photographs-of-american-photography/#comment-224 Tue, 22 Jul 2025 15:45:53 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=19540#comment-224 To me, a “good” picture is a picture showing more than what I see. This is why everyone has a different appreciation of the same picture as everyone comes with a different background. From there, I would not dare make a general statement on what is “good” and what is “bad” after visiting an exhibition.

]]>
Comment on The Ethics of Street Photography – Part 3 by Johnny Mobasher https://streetphotography.com/the-ethics-of-street-photography-part-3/#comment-223 Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:22:31 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=19511#comment-223 The Article is One Man’s Opinion. Some agree , some don’t AND it’s subjective? There are Univesal Ethics that Apply to EVERYTHING including to Street Photography or ANY Photography. Are All Art/Photography Ethically Sound!? I dont think so , same are individual’s “Ethics” are different. Thank you for reading it & commenting on it.

]]>
Comment on The Ethics of Street Photography – Part 3 by Quetenaapeter https://streetphotography.com/the-ethics-of-street-photography-part-3/#comment-222 Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:14:41 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=19511#comment-222 Sorry but I don’t see the purpose of these articles. Each of us has different ethics in our ways of being, so what? What conclusions can be drawn from this?

I practice a little (not enough for my taste) street photography, and it is interesting to read or hear the negative comments that it generates. We often swim in the middle of subjectivity dressed in the appearance of objectivity. Each commentator considers his point of view to be legitimate, which, seen with a little hindsight, makes one smile, as if everyone’s ethics should apply to everyone (nothing wrong here?). What is imposed on everyone in street photography as in other fields is the common morality that is also called the Law.

There is no doubt that street photography has a bad press. This is because the human being is represented, and someone will always find something to complain about. That’s how it is. By refusing to take the risk to offend anyone, we end up doing nothing. In short, it’s the tyranny of subjectivity against everyone and in this little game, I’m not sure we have anything to gain.

]]>
Comment on Is ANYTHING Shot On The Streets, Street Photography!? by Quetenaapeter https://streetphotography.com/is-anything-shot-on-the-streets-street-photography/#comment-221 Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:50:31 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=19443#comment-221 Hi… I agree with your definition of street photography vs picture taken in the street but it has little to do with smartphones. Their ease of use might lure newbies in thinking that the tool makes the picture but it is too good to be true. The same can be said from the resurgence of film photography which bring on the streets photographers without a clear project in mind, hence the shallowness of their work. Not that I am way better than them but, at least, I am aware of my limits!

]]>
Comment on Famous Classic Cameras and the Street Photographers Who Used Them by Johnny Mobasher https://streetphotography.com/famous-classic-cameras-and-the-street-photographers-who-used-them/#comment-220 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:18:20 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=18280#comment-220 Winogrand still managed it EXTREMELY Well…. Good Point

]]>
Comment on Is This Street Photography? by Johnny Mobasher https://streetphotography.com/is-this-street-photography/#comment-219 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:16:31 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=19202#comment-219 Thank you …. Good Comment

]]>
Comment on Famous Classic Cameras and the Street Photographers Who Used Them by length-lilac-crimp https://streetphotography.com/famous-classic-cameras-and-the-street-photographers-who-used-them/#comment-218 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 04:50:55 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=18280#comment-218 Joel Meyerowitz has always had a thing about the Leica M being special because the viewfinder is on the left of the camer back, so your right eye sees what’s in the viewfinder while your left eye continues to see the rest of the world outside the frame. I emailed him once to ask him about Winogrand, who was left-eyed: that couldn’t have been how Winogrand used his Leica Ms, could it? Sadly, Joel has never replied.

]]>
Comment on Is This Street Photography? by length-lilac-crimp https://streetphotography.com/is-this-street-photography/#comment-217 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 04:39:06 +0000 https://streetphotography.com/?p=19202#comment-217 Cartier-Bresson studied painting under André Lhote, who was obsessed with a particular approach to compositional geometry (closely related to Jay Hambridge’s ‘dynamic symmetry’). Steeped in this approach to composition, Cartier-Bresson watched for the moment when all the elements in the picture were aligned in the frame in one of these ‘perfect’ geometrical arrangements. That’s the moment he tried to capture in his photographs. The American publishers of his first book, ‘Images à la sauvette’ (‘Pictures on the fly’ or ‘Pictures on the sly’), substituted the title ‘The decisive moment’, a term that Cartier-Bresson himself avoided.

]]>